Guide language: the political channel of zhonggong current affairs updates domestic and international current affairs political hot spot,
and provides current affairs political hot spot, the time political simulation topic, the current affairs big events to remember timely the political hot spot summary and so on.
Today we focus on the political hot spot: the need for more rational voices to deal with a trade war.
On April 11, the Wall Street journal published an article by jack ma, chairman of alibaba’s board of directors, that “trade wars kill jobs, opportunities and hopes.
” Ma believes that American farmers and small and medium-sized entrepreneurs are the ultimate victims of a trade war.
In trump the government intended to provoke a trade war,
under the shadows of the article is always dedicated to connect the two countries enterprises and entrepreneurs perspective of market,
puts forward the government must consider trump the key question: whether the U.S. will give up into China,
the world’s biggest consumer market of huge historical opportunity? (the Beijing news on April 12)
There is no doubt that during this period, the news about the sino-us trade war has drawn both the eyes of the two peoples and the global attention.
After all, there are no winners in a trade war, only losses. China and the United States are the two largest economies in the world.
If a trade war breaks down, it will not only affect the interests of China and the United States, but also affect global markets and trade patterns.
Ma as a “going out” many times to participate in global economic governance agenda of opinion leaders,
in recently, repeatedly called for strong popularity don’t trade war, the U.S. government otherwise,
face is a lose-lose situation of China and the United States, and repeatedly said “completely free trade,
” he said. These rational voices are undoubtedly the strong manifestation of our country’s “not afraid of trade wars,
nor avoid trade wars, but call for cooperative development”. It published a signed article in the Wall Street journal,
urge “trump trade war is a fundamental mistake means giving up open the important historical opportunity of the world’s biggest market,
ultimately hurt farmers and small and medium-sized enterprises. This will be a historic strategic miscalculation,
which undoubtedly demonstrates the responsibility and commitment of a large Chinese enterprise to safeguard the world trade order.
As ma said, a trade war would indeed kill American jobs, opportunities and hopes.
Good trade relations between countries, with rich consultation mechanism to nourish and nurture of sincerity,
rather than a bargain, even to make trade in the form of a trade war is very difficult or stopped. When trade stops,
the world stops. This is contrary to the globalization process of “you have me, I have you”,
and the opposite is bound to lose some jobs, opportunities and hopes. Last year, for example,
Mr. Ma and Mr. Trump said they would help the U.S. create 1 million jobs through bilateral trade.
During boao’s BBS 2018 annual meeting, Mr Ma said the pledge would be void if sino-us economic relations deteriorated.
If the relationship between China and the United States is in good shape, it is not only one million jobs, but 10 million is possible.
Articles from Mr. Ma, we felt the thick of the sincerity to solve trade disputes,
not only can obviously feel the maintenance national interest and the interests of small and medium-sized enterprises and farmers stand firm,
also clearly feel the complementary advantages, resource sharing, win-win cooperation, strong confidence,
as well as to the sino-us trade relations between the two countries and the world economy’s long-term confidence.
This is the attitude that Chinese companies should take to deal with a trade war in a leisurely manner. They are neither arrogant nor self-important.
They see both worries and challenges, and they see hope and distance. In this attitude, we should make our own rational voice,
with the dual efforts of the state and the people, to prevent a trade war and promote the development of international trade.
Of course, if trade wars are inevitable, the biggest and most immediate harm is to companies.
Each of us has to strengthen our ability to withstand the risk of a trade war, such as globalization. In particular,
companies with large exports have to be prepared for a trade war. After all, Chinese companies such as ali,
with global influence, are still rare. As ma said, to really change the current situation of trade protectionism, the road is blocked and long.